top of page
Search

FIX & FLIP VS. DEVELOPMENT: WHAT ACTUALLY WINS

  • Feb 18
  • 2 min read

The “Better” Strategy Depends on Capital Stack — and Lender Fit

There’s a strong narrative right now that new development is more profitable than fix & flips.

From a distance, that can look true.

Larger spreads. Bigger projects. More upside.

But as a capital allocator, I don’t evaluate deals based on headline profit. I evaluate them based on:

  • Risk-adjusted return

  • Capital velocity

  • Structural complexity

  • Financeability

Because even a “great” deal becomes mediocre if:

  • Capital costs escalate

  • Timelines stretch beyond underwriting assumptions

  • The model depends on outside capital to stay afloat

In private lending, structure and execution matter more than projected margins.



Why Fix & Flip Still Works

Well-run fix & flip projects offer:

  • Shorter duration

  • Clearer cost visibility

  • Faster capital redeployment

  • Lower structural complexity

When executed by experienced operators with conservative leverage, they create predictable cycles of deployment and payoff.

For lenders, predictability is a form of risk control.

Velocity plus discipline compounds.



Why New Development Can Outperform — and When It Doesn’t

New development can generate stronger gross profit numbers.

But it also introduces:

  • Permitting risk

  • Longer timelines

  • Greater exposure to market shifts

  • Higher capital sensitivity

If the capital stack is not structured correctly, or if liquidity is thin, development can quickly turn from opportunity into pressure.

The difference is not the strategy.It is whether the operator can support the structure through friction.



The Real Variable: Capital Stack and Lender Fit

Here’s what most operators miss.

The “best” strategy is not the one with the biggest projected margin.It is the one you can execute repeatedly with a clean capital stack.

That means:

  • Conservative leverage

  • Clear exit assumptions

  • Real liquidity

  • A lender aligned with the project’s risk profile

As a lender, financeability is not automatic. It is earned through:

  • Track record

  • Communication

  • Structure

  • Discipline

Not all operators are financeable — and not all projects should be financed the same way.



Closing Thought

Fix & flips and new development can both be winners.

But the strategy only works if the capital structure supports it.

In lending, consistency beats complexity.Execution beats projection.Durability beats narrative.

 
 
 

Comments


THE CAPITAL EDGE NEWSLETTER
BY DEVON KENNARD

Subscribe to The Capital Edge, Devon Kennard’s weekly newsletter with insights on real estate, private lending, and business strategy. 

After subscribing, look for our confirmation email, it may appear in your promotions or spam tab.

TOOLKITS

Want to Build Wealth Faster?

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to grow your deal flow and cash flow, these toolkits are built around the real frameworks I use at 42 Solutions and Kennard Capital — especially as I deploy capital across Arizona. These aren’t theories — they’re built from the field.

 

Download one of my free real estate investing toolkits—designed to cut the learning curve in half. Whether you're an athlete starting your wealth journey or an investor ready to scale, these toolkits are packed with checklists, proven strategies, software recommendations, and team-building tips to help you take action with confidence.

Choose from toolkits covering: Single & Multi-Family Rentals, Real Estate Syndications, Private Lending, and Athlete Wealth.

bottom of page